Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755518›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Development of a three-item short form of the EAT-10 for screening suspected dysphagia in hospitalized older adults: findings from a multicentre study.

María Trinidad Castillo-García, Irene Llagostera-Reverter, Joaquín Moncho-Vasallo, Víctor M González-Chordá, Cristina Carretero-Randez, María Isabel Orts-Cortés, NUTRIFAG Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

María Trinidad Castillo-GarcíaDr. Balmis University General Hospital, Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL, Group 20), Alicante, Spain.
Irene Llagostera-ReverterNursing Department, Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), University Jaume I, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Joaquín Moncho-VasalloResearch Unit for the Analysis of Mortality and Health Statistics, Department of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine, Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
Víctor M González-ChordáNursing Department, Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), University Jaume I, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Cristina Carretero-RandezNursing Research Group: Infection, Inflammation and Chronicity (IIS La Fe), Hospital University and Polytechnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
María Isabel Orts-CortésNursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
NUTRIFAG Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To develop a three-item short form of the EAT-10 by identifying the smallest subset of items that preserves the screening performance of the full questionnaire in hospitalized older adults. Design: Multicentre cross-sectional observational study. Methods: The study was conducted in nine public hospitals in Spain within the NUTRIFAG project. Hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years with a length of stay ≥48 h were included. Patients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition at admission, those in terminal condition, or with a primary diagnosis of cancer were excluded. Suspected dysphagia was assessed using the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), with a score ≥3 considered positive. Multivariate logistic regression models with forward item selection were used to identify the most informative symptoms indicators. The sample was randomly divided into a training subset (60%) and an internal assessment subset (40%). Model performance was evaluated using Nagelkerke's pseudo Results: The sample included 2,519 participants. Three symptom indicators emerged as the most informative for identifying patients with suspected dysphagia: requiring extra effort to swallow liquids, requiring extra effort to swallow solids, and coughing while eating. Together, these indicators showed high agreement with the classification obtained using the full EAT-10 in the training phase ( Conclusion: The proposed three-item subset represents a shortened version of the EAT-10 that preserved much of the screening performance of the full questionnaire in hospitalized older adults. Although it may facilitate dysphagia screening by reproducing the classification obtained with the full EAT-10 in routine nursing assessment, independent external validation against clinical reference standards is required before its diagnostic use can be recommended.

Indexed as

ageddeglutition disordersdysphagiamass screeningnursing assessment

Identifiers

PMID42755518
PMCPMC13581644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.