ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences of malnutrition risk management in heart failure: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malnutrition risk is common among patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with disease progression and adverse clinical outcomes. However, patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) differ in their understanding of and responses to nutritional issues in HF, and early identification and ongoing management remain insufficient in clinical practice. Objective: To explore the current perceptions and needs of patients with HF and HCPs regarding malnutrition risk management, thereby supporting the implementation of systematic clinical nutrition practices and enhancing the engagement of both patients and HCPs. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study design was used. Using purposive sampling, 15 patients and 15 HCPs specializing in cardiovascular care and nutrition were recruited from the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine between September and October 2025 and participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Four themes and 10 subthemes were identified from the interviews. (1) Understanding of malnutrition risk relied on everyday experience, including viewing symptoms as manifestations of the disease, judging nutritional status based on thinness and fullness, and differing understandings of the relationship between nutrition and HF; (2) uncertainty surrounded the identification of malnutrition risk in the context of HF, including interference from fluid status and inconsistent descriptions by HCPs of clinical screening and assessment practices; (3) nutritional communication struggled to achieve shared understanding, including differences in patients' acceptance of terminology and the need for specific and actionable dietary guidance; and (4) malnutrition risk management was difficult to implement amid treatment requirements and real-world constraints, including balancing treatment goals with nutritional needs, difficulties with implementation at home, and gaps in professional support. Conclusion: Malnutrition risk management in patients with HF is a continuous process encompassing risk understanding, clinical identification, effective communication, and implementation at home. Future efforts could strengthen dynamic, multidimensional nutritional risk assessment, promote communication in specific and practical terms relevant to daily life, and establish a continuous management pathway covering screening, assessment, referral, and follow-up through multidisciplinary collaboration and family involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.