SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Effects of internal and external attentional focus on dart-throwing performance: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Attentional focus is a central issue in motor control and motor learning research. Existing evidence generally suggests that an external focus of attention (EF) is more beneficial than an internal focus of attention (IF); however, findings in the context of dart throwing remain inconsistent and may be influenced by factors such as task demands, test phase, and learner characteristics. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the effects of EF and IF on dart-throwing performance and to examine potential sources of variation in these effects. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, covering all records from database inception to February 27, 2026. Experimental studies comparing the effects of EF and IF on dart-throwing performance in healthy individuals were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). Given variation in study designs, outcome reporting, and assessment phases, together with insufficient information for deriving comparable effect estimates in some studies, the evidence was synthesized narratively. Results: A total of 19 studies comprising 23 experimental units and 923 participants were included. During acquisition, EF-favoring effects were observed in several studies, but the overall findings were mixed, with conditional and non-significant results also frequently reported. Some retention studies also favored EF, whereas transfer evidence remained sparse and inconsistent. Overall, attentional focus effects in dart throwing appear to be context dependent, with their direction and magnitude potentially varying across testing phases, task demands, practice and test arrangements, and learner characteristics. Conclusions: The evidence does not support a uniform advantage of either attentional focus strategy in dart throwing. Rather, EF-IF effects appear to be context dependent and sensitive to the phase of testing and study conditions. These findings support a more task-specific and conditional interpretation of attentional focus effects, highlighting the need for standardized research with delayed retention and transfer assessments before firm instructional recommendations can be made. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261363437, identifier PROSPERO, CRD420261363437.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.