ArticleFrontiers in cognition2026
Prêt-à-Jouer: commercial videogames as ready-made human perception labs.
Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive science has long relied on carefully controlled laboratory paradigms to study perception, attention, and executive functioning, raising persistent questions about ecological validity when scenes are complex, demands are self-paced, and outcomes matter to the observer. Commercial videogames present exactly this kind of environment. They are cognitively demanding by design, motivating by nature and consistent enough across players to support systematic behavioral comparison. Unlike the tools of typical laboratory research, they already exist. Here, we encourage researchers to treat commercial games as ready-made testing grounds requiring only a minimal experimental toolkit of screen recording, eye tracking, and behavioral timing. We describe how researchers can select games, generate testable perceptual hypotheses directly from a game's affordances, and implement within-subjects designs, with no engine access or developer cooperation required. We close by distinguishing the ecological questions this approach can answer from the mechanistic ones it cannot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.