ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2026
Reasons for participation and experiences of women in an antibody-mediated HIV prevention clinical trial in Malawi.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: in the Antibody-Mediated Prevention (AMP) trials, a broadly neutralizing antibody called VRC01 was infused intravenously every two months to test its safety and HIV prevention efficacy. The AMP trial conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, called HVTN 703, enrolled women without HIV who were not pregnant or breastfeeding but who were behaviorally vulnerable to HIV-1 infection. We conducted a qualitative study in Malawi to explore the motivations and experiences of trial participants. Methods: between September and December 2018, we purposively selected and interviewed 12 out of 100 women enrolled in the AMP trial at the UNC Project site in Lilongwe, Malawi. We conducted in-depth interviews (IDI) with women who were retained in the trial. All IDIs were conducted in Chichewa, digitally recorded, and then transcribed into English. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: women participated in the AMP trial due to a range of perceived benefits. The primary reason was access to better quality medical care, accompanied by financial benefits and altruism. Participants' research experiences and their continued participation in the AMP trial were influenced by the research clinic environment and the nature of their interactions with research staff. Regardless of pre-existing study expectations, feeling welcomed and being able to openly interact with the study staff encouraged them to continue participating in the study. Conclusion: antibody-mediated prevention study participants enrolled and continued their participation because of perceived benefits such as access to quality health care, finances, and altruism. Provision of other health services to research participants promotes participation in the trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.