ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Paired vagus nerve stimulation for post-stroke shoulder motor recovery: corticospinal-C5 motor network plasticity and rehabilitation applications.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shoulder motor impairment after stroke restricts reaching, self-care, balance reactions, and the use of mobility aids. Paired vagus nerve stimulation (pVNS), in which brief cervical vagus nerve stimulation is temporally coupled to task-specific rehabilitation, improves overall upper-extremity impairment and activity in selected people with chronic ischemic stroke. Its shoulder-specific effects, however, remain uncertain. This Mini Review evaluates pVNS through a corticospinal-C5 motor-network frameworkthat links movement-related cortical ensembles, descending corticospinal and reticulospinal pathways, cervical C5 motor pools, and the peripheral motor units controlling the supraspinatus, deltoid, infraspinatus, and scapular stabilizers. Preclinical studies show that appropriately timed pVNS recruits noradrenergic, cholinergic, and serotonergic systems, promotes movement-specific motor-cortical plasticity, and augments forelimb recovery after experimental stroke. Randomized clinical trials demonstrate durable improvement in composite upper-limb outcomes, leading to regulatory approval for moderate-to-severe arm impairment after chronic ischemic stroke. Nevertheless, secondary analyses indicate a clearer treatment advantage for distal than proximal components, and shoulder abduction has not been tested as an independent primary endpoint. We therefore outline a candidate shoulder-focused rehabilitation model combining graded antigravity abduction, external rotation, scapular control, and functional reaching with defined stimulation pairing and multimodal monitoring. The model presupposes an intact peripheral C5 motor unit: pVNS cannot repair complete C5-root, upper-trunk, suprascapular, or axillary nerve denervation. Shoulder-specific trials incorporating kinematics, electromyography, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and tract imaging are required before efficacy for proximal recovery can be claimed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.