Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755463›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2025

The Neuroscience of Marketing: Noninvasive Neuromarketing Methods for Understanding Consumer Choice and Priorities.

Pradeep K, Sathya Prasad P V, Rajalakshmi S A, Chriso Ricky Gill J, Jisha V G

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pradeep KDepartment of Media Studies, Christujayanthi University (DU), Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8694-0786
Sathya Prasad P VDepartment of Media Studies, Christujayanthi University (DU), Bengaluru, India.
Rajalakshmi S ADepartment of Media Studies, Christujayanthi University (DU), Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-8683
Chriso Ricky Gill JDepartment of English, Vel Tech High Tech Dr. Rangarajan Dr. Sakunthala Engineering College, Avadi, India.
Jisha V GDepartment of English, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumaracoil, Thuckalay, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromarketing and consumer neuroscience aim to enhance self-report and behavioral techniques by assessing neurophysiological and psychophysiological reactions that are frequently challenging to quantify. This study consolidates non-invasive tools frequently employed to examine consumer reactions to marketing stimuli, emphasizing the metrics each method assesses, the marketing inquiries it may reliably address, and the potential dangers of inference involved. We systematically compile evidence pertaining to constructs fundamental to consumer choice, including attention, affective arousal, memory encoding, and valuation, while comparing methodologies such as EEG, fMRI, TMS, Steady State Topography and MEG. The article proposes a method selection matrix that associates common research and applied inquiries (e.g., advertising attention dynamics, packaging assessment, pricing, and value indicators) with suitable measurement strategies, highlighting trade-offs concerning temporal/spatial resolution, ecological validity, cost, and interpretability. Finally, examine methodological challenges and ethical obligations. The scoping review concludes with research gaps where multimodal and more ecologically valid designs are most likely to advance the field.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorMarketingNeurosciencesHumansConsumer behaviourMarketingNeuromarketingNeuroscience of Marketingnon-invasive techniques

Identifiers

PMID42755463
PMCPMC13579028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.