ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Measuring proactive-instrumental aggression in adolescents and young adults-development and preliminary validity evidence for the Degree-of-Quiz-Difficulty Paradigm.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aggression can be distinguished into reactive and proactive forms, which differ in their motivational and emotional characteristics. While reactive aggression is typically triggered by provocation and accompanied by heightened emotional arousal, proactive aggression is goal-directed, instrumentally motivated, and characterized by greater emotional control. Despite its relevance for antisocial behavior, proactive aggression is still assessed predominantly through self-report measures, and experimental paradigms specifically designed to capture it remain scarce, particularly for adolescents. Methods: The present study aimed to develop and provide preliminary validity evidence for a novel experimental paradigm, the Degree-of-Quiz-Difficulty Paradigm (DoQD), to objectively assess proactive aggression in adolescents and young adults. In this competitive task, participants ( Results: Although the difficulty index was not associated with self-reported proactive aggression, it showed the expected significant associations with caregiver-reported externalizing behaviors, particularly rule-breaking behavior, suggesting links to instrumental aggression. In contrast, no associations emerged with psychophysiological stress indicators, supporting the notion that proactive aggression occurs without heightened emotional arousal. Higher difficulty indices were also associated with increased feelings of guilt during and after the task, indicating that guilt may accompany but not necessarily inhibit proactive aggressive behavior. Regarding personality traits, the difficulty index showed a significant negative association with cooperativeness, whereas associations with empathy were not significant after correction for multiple testing. Discussion: Overall, the findings provide preliminary validity support for the DoQD as an objective, time-efficient behavioral paradigm relevant to the assessment of proactive aggression, with evidence limited to selected validity indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.