ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Age-related differences in facial emotion recognition across adulthood: accuracy and confidence in the 30s, 50s, and 70s.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Age-related changes in facial emotion recognition have been widely documented; however, relatively few studies have examined these changes across adulthood, including middle age. Little is also known about how confidence in these judgments changes across adulthood and how these processes relate to empathy. The present study examined age and gender differences in recognition accuracy, confidence, and empathy, as well as the relationships among these factors. Methods: A total of 695 adults in their 30s, 50s, and 70s were included in the final analyses. Participants completed a facial emotion recognition task with six emotional expressions and provided confidence ratings for each response. They also completed a self-report measure of cognitive and affective empathy. Results: Age group differences in recognition accuracy were emotion-specific and, in some cases, modulated by gender. Confidence analyses showed that age group was associated with an increased likelihood of high-confidence errors, whereas no significant age-group effect was observed for high-confidence correct responses; a direct test of the age group × correctness interaction did not reach significance. Empathy analyses indicated small but consistent gender differences, with women scoring higher than men, and no clear age-related effects. Associations between empathy and recognition performance were modest, with cognitive empathy showing a small positive relationship in men aged in their 70s, whereas affective empathy showed no clear association. Discussion: These findings indicate that age group differences in facial emotion recognition involve not only perceptual accuracy but also metacognitive evaluation, and do not support a simple decline in performance in later adulthood. The results further suggest that cognitive and affective empathy differ in their relationship to emotion recognition, indicating partially distinct components of socioemotional functioning across adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.