Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755230›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026

Uncovering structural variation in conifer gigagenomes: evolutionary insights and technical challenges.

Hui Liu, Wei Zhao, Jing-Fang Guo, Xue-Mei Yan, Yan-Jing Liu, Qing-Yin Zeng, Xiao-Ru Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hui LiuDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Geoscience, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Umeå University, Umeå SE-90187, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1980-5952
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Geoscience, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Umeå University, Umeå SE-90187, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9437-3198
Jing-Fang GuoSchool of Horticulture and Food, Guangdong Eco-Engineering Polytechnic, Guangzhou 510520, China.ORCID 0009-0001-4946-045X
Xue-Mei YanState Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1246-9703
Yan-Jing LiuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1986-543X
Qing-Yin ZengState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5730-3016
Xiao-Ru WangDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Geoscience, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Umeå University, Umeå SE-90187, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6150-7046

Funding

Formas 2021-02155National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFD2200100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural variants (SVs) are a major yet understudied source of genomic variation in conifers, whose large, repeat-rich genomes have hindered systematic SV discovery. Here, we combined whole-genome long-read and short-read sequencing to characterize the genomic landscape, functional impact, and evolutionary significance of SVs in a complex of three closely related pine species (Pinus densata, Pinus tabuliformis, and Pinus yunnanensis) with a hybridization history. From 21 long-read-sequenced individuals, we identified 5.7 million SVs, comprising 52% insertions, 43% deletions, and 5% inversions, duplications, and translocations. Approximately 97% of SVs were located in intergenic and intronic regions, and 60% overlapped transposable elements, whose activity shapes SV abundance and size variation. The proportion of loss-of-function (LoF) mutations was hundreds-fold higher among SVs than SNPs, with longer SVs more likely to cause LoF effects across all SV classes. Estimates of population diversity based on SVs and SNPs were largely concordant. In P. densata, the retention of parental SVs highlights the genomic signature of its admixed ancestry. We conducted graph pangenome-based SV genotyping in 29 short-read-sequenced individuals, yielding 44% recall and 70% precision, underlining the challenge of accurately recovering long-read-derived SVs in highly repetitive conifer genomes. Population-level selection scans on SNPs and genotyped SVs identified only 19% of candidate gene loci in common, indicating that the two marker types capture complementary components of environmental adaptation. Our findings demonstrate the importance of SVs as a dimension of genomic diversity and provide a foundation for integrating structural variation into evolutionary studies, conservation genomics, and tree breeding.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomic Structural VariationPinusDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA Transposable Elementsbioinformatic artifactsfunctional effectgraph pangenomePinusstructural variantstransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID42755230
PMCPMC13637045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.