ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Uncovering structural variation in conifer gigagenomes: evolutionary insights and technical challenges.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural variants (SVs) are a major yet understudied source of genomic variation in conifers, whose large, repeat-rich genomes have hindered systematic SV discovery. Here, we combined whole-genome long-read and short-read sequencing to characterize the genomic landscape, functional impact, and evolutionary significance of SVs in a complex of three closely related pine species (Pinus densata, Pinus tabuliformis, and Pinus yunnanensis) with a hybridization history. From 21 long-read-sequenced individuals, we identified 5.7 million SVs, comprising 52% insertions, 43% deletions, and 5% inversions, duplications, and translocations. Approximately 97% of SVs were located in intergenic and intronic regions, and 60% overlapped transposable elements, whose activity shapes SV abundance and size variation. The proportion of loss-of-function (LoF) mutations was hundreds-fold higher among SVs than SNPs, with longer SVs more likely to cause LoF effects across all SV classes. Estimates of population diversity based on SVs and SNPs were largely concordant. In P. densata, the retention of parental SVs highlights the genomic signature of its admixed ancestry. We conducted graph pangenome-based SV genotyping in 29 short-read-sequenced individuals, yielding 44% recall and 70% precision, underlining the challenge of accurately recovering long-read-derived SVs in highly repetitive conifer genomes. Population-level selection scans on SNPs and genotyped SVs identified only 19% of candidate gene loci in common, indicating that the two marker types capture complementary components of environmental adaptation. Our findings demonstrate the importance of SVs as a dimension of genomic diversity and provide a foundation for integrating structural variation into evolutionary studies, conservation genomics, and tree breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.