ArticleAnnals of occupational and environmental medicine2026
Relationship between shark meat intake and blood mercury concentration in Korean adolescents.
Article in Annals of occupational and environmental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMercury exposure through seafood consumption poses health risks, yet limited research has examined shark meat-a large predatory fish still consumed in Korea-and its association with blood mercury levels in adolescents.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the 3rd Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KNEHS). Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between shark meat intake and blood mercury levels and to estimate the odds ratios for exceeding the reference blood mercury level, adjusting for potential confounders.
resultsOf the 912 participants, 50 (5.5%) were identified as shark meat consumption group. Shark meat consumption was associated with higher blood mercury concentrations (β = 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.59), with the highest levels observed among those who consumed shark meat within the past 30 days (β = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.30-2.08), those who preferred shark meat (β = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.26-1.08), and those with higher annual intake (β = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.00-1.43). Shark meat consumers had substantially higher odds of exceeding the blood mercury reference level (≥5.8 μg/L; odds ratio: 35.84; 95% CI: 3.39-378.84), with an estimated attributable risk of 97.2% (95% CI: 70.5%-99.7%) and a population attributable risk of 65.7% (95% CI: 11.6%-95.4%). Of the estimated 25,740 (95% range: 11,905-54,913) adolescents aged 12-17 years potentially exceeding this threshold, approximately 16,911 (95% CI: 2,986-24,556) cases may be attributable to shark meat consumption, though these estimates should be interpreted cautiously given the wide confidence intervals.
conclusionsShark meat consumption was associated with elevated blood mercury levels in Korean adolescents. Targeted education on its potential health risks is needed to reduce unintended exposure, while maintaining the nutritional benefits of fish consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.