ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
Engaging Service Users in Co-Designing a Nurse-Led Weight Talk Tool for Low- and Medium-Secure Mental Health Inpatient Settings: A Participatory Intervention Development Study.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 80% of individuals in secure mental health units are overweight or obese, yet nurses often lack practical guidance on how to initiate and sustain weight-related conversations in these complex settings. This study aimed to co-design an evidence-based, nurse-led weight talk tool with service users and nursing staff, and to evaluate its acceptability and usability in low- and medium-secure inpatient care. A multi-stage, iterative design was undertaken. Initial evidence informed development, followed by a person-centred co-design process involving service users and staff through workshops, structured discussions and repeated feedback. The tool was subsequently evaluated using a think-aloud approach with 19 nurse-service user pairs, enabling real-time exploration of usability, understanding, and emotional responses. Co-design produced a structured, visually engaging tool tailored to the sensitivities and constraints of secure mental health settings. Service users and staff shaped key refinements, including simplified language, removal of potentially stigmatising elements, enhanced visual design, and the inclusion of structured opening and closing components to support psychologically safe conversations. Evaluation findings demonstrated high acceptability and usability. Service users valued the respectful, collaborative approach, while nurses reported increased confidence in addressing weight-related issues. These findings highlight the value of co-design as a method for developing acceptable, contextually relevant interventions for sensitive clinical topics. Embedding collaborative approaches within mental health nursing practice may strengthen therapeutic engagement and support more effective, person-centred care across diverse international settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.