ArticlePest management science2026
Improved impact from the use of beneficial natural enemy species in Australian canola systems: challenges and required tools.
Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The concept of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has developed into a practical framework for sustainable pest management and is widely adopted in modern farming systems. Beneficial arthropods (natural enemies, such as predators and parasitoids) have shown potential for use in pest management, leading to observable production benefits. However, using beneficials is perhaps the most challenging IPM component to adopt at scale and in Australian canola systems, adoption remains low. Here we consider the challenges for measuring impact from beneficials in a way that links to production benefits for growers. To get an industry perspective, we surveyed canola growers and their advisors to understand their constraints and priorities for using beneficials for improved pest management. There were few practices to support and conserve beneficials adopted at scale (use of selective insecticides was the most used practice), and significant knowledge gaps about what impacts growers were likely to see if certain practices were to be adopted. Despite these knowledge gaps, canola growers and their advisors aspired towards more active management of beneficials. From our synthesis, we outline the new tools that are needed, designed specifically for beneficials, and present a pathway forward to enable the greater use of beneficials. We suggest that incremental steps are required for proactive transitions rather than whole-system shifts driven by industry crises. © 2026 Commonwealth of Australia. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.