Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755108›Full record

ArticlePest management science2026

Improved impact from the use of beneficial natural enemy species in Australian canola systems: challenges and required tools.

Sarina Macfadyen, Basman Al-Jalely, Mukti Chalise, Maryam Ehsangar, Zorica Duric, Joanne Holloway, Andrew Hulthen, Precious Mavende, Paul Melloy, Svetlana Micic and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sarina MacfadyenCommonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Acton, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-4910
Basman Al-JalelyMurdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Mukti ChaliseNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Calala, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8046-7878
Maryam EhsangarSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Zorica DuricNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Calala, Australia.
Joanne HollowayNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Andrew HulthenCommonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Brisbane, Australia.
Precious MavendeSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Paul MelloyCommonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Brisbane, Australia.
Svetlana MicicDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development Western Australia, Orana, Australia.
Hazel ParryCommonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-3182
Shovon Chandra SarkarMurdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6860-4367
Jessa ThurmanCommonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Brisbane, Australia.
Maarten Van HeldenSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Xiaobei WangCommonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Brisbane, Australia.
Wei XuMurdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4019-5140

Funding

Grains Research and Development Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has developed into a practical framework for sustainable pest management and is widely adopted in modern farming systems. Beneficial arthropods (natural enemies, such as predators and parasitoids) have shown potential for use in pest management, leading to observable production benefits. However, using beneficials is perhaps the most challenging IPM component to adopt at scale and in Australian canola systems, adoption remains low. Here we consider the challenges for measuring impact from beneficials in a way that links to production benefits for growers. To get an industry perspective, we surveyed canola growers and their advisors to understand their constraints and priorities for using beneficials for improved pest management. There were few practices to support and conserve beneficials adopted at scale (use of selective insecticides was the most used practice), and significant knowledge gaps about what impacts growers were likely to see if certain practices were to be adopted. Despite these knowledge gaps, canola growers and their advisors aspired towards more active management of beneficials. From our synthesis, we outline the new tools that are needed, designed specifically for beneficials, and present a pathway forward to enable the greater use of beneficials. We suggest that incremental steps are required for proactive transitions rather than whole-system shifts driven by industry crises. © 2026 Commonwealth of Australia. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

AgricultureArthropodsBrassica napusPest Control, BiologicalAnimalsAustraliabiological controlecosystem servicesfarm practice surveynatural enemiesparasitoidspredators

Identifiers

PMID42755108
PMCPMC13665602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.