SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
First-line biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs versus methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of remission outcomes.
Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate initial therapy with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs), compared with methotrexate, in patients with early RA.
methodsWe systematically reviewed and meta-analysed randomized-controlled trials comparing initial b/tsDMARDs, combined with methotrexate or as monotherapy, against methotrexate in methotrexate-naïve adults with early RA. Pairwise and network meta-analysis were performed to compare DAS28 remission attainment, with the primary analysis at 6 months and secondary analyses at 3 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included ACR50 response and CDAI remission.
resultsTwenty-nine trials (13 387 participants) were included. Compared with methotrexate alone, initial b/tsDMARDs plus methotrexate significantly increased DAS28 remission at 6 months (risk ratio [RR] 1.62; 95% CI: 1.39, 1.89), 3 months (RR 1.95; 1.47, 2.57) and 12 months (RR 1.54; 1.39, 1.71), with benefits also observed for CDAI remission and ACR50 response. In network meta-analysis, all b/tsDMARD classes combined with methotrexate had higher remission rates than methotrexate alone. The benefits of b/tsDMARDs plus methotrexate were greater in studies with higher baseline disease activity and a greater proportion of rheumatoid factor-positive participants. As monotherapy, b/tsDMARDs increased DAS28 remission attainment compared with methotrexate at 6 months (RR 1.81; 1.42, 2.31), 3 months (RR 1.92; 1.31, 2.83) and 12 months (RR 1.46; 1.25, 1.71); however, at individual class level, significantly higher remission rates were observed only with tocilizumab and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor monotherapy.
conclusionInitial therapy with b/tsDMARDs in combination with methotrexate is associated with higher remission rates than methotrexate alone in patients with early RA. As monotherapy, higher remission rates were observed for JAK inhibitors and tocilizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.