ReviewThe Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research2026
Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Premalignant Lesions.
Review in The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The Correa cascade posits that intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma develops through a stepwise progression from chronic gastritis to atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia, highlighting the importance of early detection of premalignant lesions. The use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly convolutional neural network-based deep-learning models, in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has been expanding rapidly. This review examines the current role of such models in the endoscopic diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric dysplasia. Data from meta-analyses indicate pooled sensitivities and specificities exceeding 90%, with performance comparable to that of expert endoscopists. The results of randomized trials suggest that AI-assisted endoscopy may improve the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia, particularly for small and subtle lesions. However, these trials are few and were conducted exclusively in China. Moreover, they largely evaluated systems of a single lineage. The one trial that prespecified centralized pathologic review found no improvement in neoplasm detection. Thus, multicenter prospective validation and real-world data are necessary before AI can be reliably used to inform routine clinical decision-making. Moreover, further integration of AI models into practice will depend on the availability of appropriate human-AI interfaces and unified multitask platforms and the resolution of hitherto unresolved legal and ethical concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.