ReviewThe Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research2026
Pepsinogen Assay Findings in Individuals With Gastric Atrophy and Intestinal Metaplasia.
Review in The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Serum pepsinogen (PG) testing is widely used as a non-invasive biomarker for gastric atrophy; however, its clinical interpretation varies depending on the severity and distribution of gastritis as well as on the assay methods. Autoimmune gastritis is characterized by markedly decreased PG I levels and PG I/II ratios, along with increased gastrin levels, reflecting profound corpus atrophy. In contrast, Helicobacter pylori-associated atrophy typically shows moderate reductions in PG I levels and PG I/II ratios, with variability according to the extent of antral and corpus involvement. Accumulating evidence indicates that PG testing is more effective at identifying severe atrophy and higher Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment stages than detecting mild atrophy. Notably, cutoff values differ substantially between assay systems, with higher PG I and PG I/II cutoff values observed in GastroPanel tests than in East Asian kits interpreted with the ABC method. Overall, PG testing is useful for detecting advanced corpus atrophy and stratifying gastric cancer risk when combined with gastrin measurement, but has limited sensitivity for early-stage disease. Monitoring low PG I/II ratios and high gastrin levels may improve risk assessment, particularly in patients with corpus atrophy or persistent intestinal metaplasia after H. pylori eradication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.