Observational studyAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
Divergent associations of estimated cardiorespiratory fitness with cognitive trajectories in Chinese and U.S. middle-aged and older adults: A descriptive cross-national comparison from CHARLS and HRS.
Observational study in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and cognition may differ across populations, but cross-cultural evidence remains limited. We explored whether estimated CRF (eCRF) shows divergent associations with cognitive trajectories in Chinese and U.S. middle-aged and older adults.
methodsWe included 3458 participants from CHARLS and 6905 from HRS. Cognitive trajectories were identified using latent class growth modelling. eCRF was estimated using sex-specific non-exercise algorithms. The unit of eCRF is metabolic equivalents of task (MET). Multinomial logistic regression examined the association between eCRF (per 1-MET increase) and trajectory membership, with the persistently high trajectory as the reference.
resultsThree cognitive trajectories-persistently high, moderate, and low-were identified in both cohorts. In CHARLS, higher eCRF was unexpectedly associated with increased odds of the low (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.43) and moderate (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.18) trajectories. In HRS, higher eCRF was associated with lower odds of the moderate trajectory (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.98), with no significant association for the low trajectory. DISCUSSION: This descriptive observation reveals divergent associations in the eCRF-cognition relationship between Chinese and U.S. adults, but should be interpreted cautiously. The finding persisted across multiple sensitivity analyses. However, given the lack of direct CRF measurement and objective assessment of activity type, we cannot distinguish whether this divergence reflects measurement differences and residual confounding, or true biological heterogeneity. Context-specific validation of eCRF equations and objective activity-specific measures are needed to clarify eCRF's role in cognitive aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.