Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42754910›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026

Centring the voices of birth mothers who faced infant removal through the co-production of the MUMS@RISC artwork: an arts-based evaluation of trauma-informed research collaboration and participation.

Kaat De Backer, Tonka Uzu, Brooklynn Reid, Erica Hayhoe, Angela Frazer-Wicks, Cassandra Lawrence, Pauline Bentley, Elsa Montgomery, Jane Sandall, Abigail Easter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kaat De BackerDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. kaat.de_backer@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5202-2808
Tonka UzuCambridge School of Art, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Brooklynn Reid *Expert by Experience, NA, England, UK.
Erica Hayhoe *Expert by Experience, NA, England, UK.
Angela Frazer-WicksExpert by Experience, NA, England, UK.
Cassandra LawrenceExpert by Experience, NA, England, UK.
Pauline BentleyExpert by Experience, NA, England, UK.
Elsa MontgomeryMethodologies Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4193-1261
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-743X
Abigail EasterDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6537

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council King's College London Impact Accellerator AwardNational Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR302565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the UK, newborn babies are a growing group of children entering the care system due to safeguarding concerns. Their mothers often experienced a life course of adversity and trauma, resulting in fractured trust in public services and health and social care professionals. Moreover, pregnant and postnatal women with involvement from child protection agencies are known to have increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. To address the existing evidence gaps around perinatal healthcare and outcomes for this group of women, the MUMS@RISC study was designed, with cyclical involvement of an advisory group with women with lived experience.

methodsWe adopted a trauma-informed approach to public and patient involvement and engagement, which was reflected in our study values, the study design, as well as in our dissemination strategy.

resultsAs part of the dissemination, a summary report with key research findings was co-produced, accompanied by artwork that was co-created by the advisory panel, the lead researcher and an artist. The step-by-step process of co-creation of the MUMS@RISC artwork allowed for gradual incorporation of feedback of the advisory panel, resulting in intricate layers of details and meaning in each of the illustrations.

conclusionsOur approach to trauma-informed research collaboration and participation demonstrates that involving people with traumatic lived experience in a robust, sensitive way can be done and strengthens the credibility, contextual accuracy and interpretative validity of research findings. Our evaluation of co-producing artwork as part of our dissemination strategy highlights the potentially healing and empowering nature of genuine and sensitive co-production, providing a rare opportunity to centre the voices of a marginalised group of mothers and reflect their stories within the wider research findings through art.

Indexed as

Child protectionCo-producing artworkCreative methodsMaternity service researchPatient and public involvement

Identifiers

PMID42754910
PMCPMC13584445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.