Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42754903›Full record

ReviewResearch involvement and engagement2026

Management of choking in Motor Neuron Disease: patient and public involvement in a co-produced mixed-methods study protocol.

Dorinda Moffatt, Lisa Hinton, Lucinda Spurway, Angela Martin, Neil Drinkwater, Donna Noonan, Claire Rose, Sara Mazzucco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dorinda MoffattProspect Hospice, Moormead Road, Swindon, SN4 9BY, UK.
Lisa HintonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Lucinda SpurwaySwindon Community Speech and Language Therapy Services, HCRG Care Services Ltd, Downs Way, Swindon, SN3 6BW, UK.
Angela MartinNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Neil DrinkwaterMotor Neurone Disease Association, Francis Crick House, 6 Summerhouse Road, Moulton Park, Northampton, NN3 6BJ, UK.
Donna NoonanGreat Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, SN3 6BB, UK.
Claire RoseGreat Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, SN3 6BB, UK.
Sara MazzuccoGreat Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, SN3 6BB, UK. sara.mazzucco@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Motor Neurone Disease Association Mazzucco/Oct24/2410-794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to 70% of people living with Motor Neuron Disease (plwMND) report distressing episodes of choking (a feeling of suffocation or airways blockage) due to involvement of bulbar muscles. There is an evidence gap on management of choking in plwMND, which is mirrored by the absence of guidance and training for healthcare professionals. Choking in plwMND is associated with other signs of bulbar involvement, such as communication difficulties due to dysarthria, which can be a barrier to effective participation in research. In this study protocol, we describe an innovative approach to meaningful involvement of plwMND, to co-produce a research project on management of choking tailored to their needs and aligning with their priorities.

methodsPhase 1 (Patient and public involvement co-design meeting): We first engaged in a meeting with plwMND, carers and healthcare professionals, to identify their priorities in relation to improving management of choking in MND. To ensure inclusive participation, we used the Theory of Change framework; people with communication difficulties were supported by a Speech and Language Therapist through their chosen augmentative and alternative communication aids. A key priority identified was the need to produce evidence-based guidance for management of choking tailored to the needs of plwMND. Phase 2 (Healthcare research study protocol on management of choking): based on the outcome of Phase 1, a multidisciplinary team (including individuals with lived experience) designed a mixed-methods, multi-centre research project based on four work packages (WPs). WP1: systematic review of the existing scientific literature on management of choking; WP2: interviews and focus groups with people with lived experience of choking in MND; WP3: co-design of a clinical algorithm detailing interventions to manage choking, based on WP1 and 2; WP4: algorithm development and dissemination with continuous involvement and input from people with lived experience through a Patient and Public Involvement co-applicant and patients' representatives. DISCUSSION: In plwMND and choking, barriers to inclusion in PPI and research range from reduced accessibility due to physical disabilities, to discriminatory sampling due to communication issues. Through inclusive engagement at the outset, plwMND highlighted a mismatch between their priorities (gaining knowledge about choking and feeling empowered to manage it at home) and available evidence (lack of guidance and training for healthcare professionals). This research project aligns with what matters to most affected patients, their carers and healthcare professionals, aiming to fill an evidence gap through new guidance to manage choking tailored to their needs.

Indexed as

ChokingCo-designCommunication difficultyCo-productionDisabilityMotor Neuron DiseasePatient and public involvementTheory of change

Identifiers

PMID42754903
PMCPMC13584399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.