ArticleBMC nursing2026
Grounded theory study on the psychological and behavioural processes of medical nurses in response to patient incivility.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient incivility is a significant source of work-related stress for nurses, particularly in highly interactive departments such as internal medicine. Although such behaviours are low in intensity, they occur frequently, continuously depleting nurses' emotional and psychological resources and impacting their well-being and the safety of nursing care. Existing research predominantly focuses on the impact at an overall level, lacking in-depth understanding of nurses' individual cognition, coping strategies, and internal psychological processes within specific situations. This study aimed to explore the psychological and behavioural processes of medical nurses when encountering uncivil behaviours from patients, and to provide a basis for clinical management and support systems.
methodsA qualitative research method using Grounded Theory was adopted. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 nurses recruited from the internal medicine department of a tertiary hospital in China. Interview data were analysed using NVivo 12 software, following the principle of constant comparison. A theoretical model was constructed through open coding, axial coding, and selective coding.
resultsThe analysis generated four core themes: (1) Situational Perception and Cognitive Appraisal: Nurses distinguish between emotional dysregulation caused by illness and purely malicious intent. (2) Diverse Coping Strategies: Including relational repair, boundary setting, cognitive reappraisal, and seeking external support. (3) Internal Negotiation: Reflected in the conflict between suppressing emotional expression and adhering to professional roles, the negotiation between professional ethics and personal dignity, and the trade-off between short-term and long-term outcomes. (4) Outcomes and Reflections: Manifested as changes in nurse-patient relationship quality, the dual outcomes of professional versus psychological capital, and the perceived absence of and demands for organizational support.
conclusionNurses' responses to patient incivility constitute a dynamic, cognitively-driven psychological process. The core dilemma lies in the internal negotiation and resource depletion inherent in emotional labour. The effectiveness of individual coping strategies is limited, and systemic impact depends on the support of the organizational environment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.