Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42754848›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026

The effect of antibacterial mouthwash on blood pressure in humans: a scoping review.

Bhavik Singh, Parker North, Zoë M Rushetsky, Richard C Brito, Francis E Jenney

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bhavik SinghPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Suwanee, GA, USA.
Parker NorthUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Zoë M RushetskyPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Suwanee, GA, USA.
Richard C BritoCollege of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida Agricultural & Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Francis E JenneyPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Suwanee, GA, USA. FrancisJe@pcom.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral hygiene is a key component of health. Practices for oral hygiene include brushing teeth with toothpaste, flossing, and mouth washing. It has been reported that 36% of United States adults use mouthwash daily. However, antibacterial mouthwashes kill oral nitrate-reducing bacteria, thus impairing nitric oxide production. Nitric oxide is a key molecule in vasodilation and blood pressure regulation, often acting as a mediator, so there is a potential for antibacterial mouthwashes to cause elevated blood pressure. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to address the question: Does antibacterial mouthwash use significantly increase blood pressure in humans?

methodsA scoping review was conducted utilizing the databases PubMed and Scopus. Our search terms included "mouthwash," "chlorhexidine," "antibacterial," "salivary nitrite," "nitrate," and MeSH terms like "blood pressure" and "hypertension." Inclusion criteria required primary research articles since 2014 that analyzed changes in blood pressure in human adults after using antibacterial mouthwash. Studies with pediatric participants, animal studies, reviews, or studies that did not measure blood pressure changes were excluded. 51 studies were retrieved from the search, and after independent screening by two reviewers, nine studies were included in the scoping review. Reviewers extracted data on study methodology, sample size, participant characteristics, type of mouthwash, mouthwash regimen, and study results. Reviewers also appraised study quality using a modified Downs and Black assessment checklist.

resultsNine studies were included: four randomized crossover trials, three nonrandomized crossover trials, one active-controlled trial, and one observational study. The studies were of good quality (mean modified Downs and Black score was 21.9 ± 2.9 out of 28 points). Five studies found significant blood pressure elevations after mouthwash usage, while four studies found no significant relationship.

conclusionsHeterogeneity in intervention lengths, mouthwash composition, participant characteristics, and blood-pressure assessment schedules, in addition to methodological weaknesses (such as inadequate washout periods and lack of randomization) in some studies make the pooled evidence inconclusive. Consequently, no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the effect of antibacterial mouthwash on blood pressure at this time. Future research should utilize larger, randomized trials with standard washout periods and long-term monitoring to further clarify the relationship between antibacterial mouthwash usage and blood pressure.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBlood PressureHypertensionMouthwashesOral HygieneAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsMouthwashesAntibacterialBlood pressureHypertensionMouthwash

Identifiers

PMID42754848
PMCPMC13584244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.