Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42754847›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

Long-term telephone follow-up of older adults attending a smoking cessation clinic in Türkiye: a retrospective cohort study.

Fatma Gökşin Cihan, Hatice Küçükceran, Nur Demirbas, Aynur Yalçıntaş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatma Gökşin CihanDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Düzce University, Düzce, Türkiye. fatmagoksincihan@duzce.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7393-6860
Hatice KüçükceranDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye.
Nur DemirbasDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye.
Aynur YalçıntaşKaratay No. 9 70th Year Karaaslan Family Health Center, Konya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking cessation remains beneficial in later life, yet long-term information on smoking status and cessation experiences among older adults attending smoking cessation services is limited. This study descriptively evaluated long-term smoking status and cessation experiences in older adults previously attending a smoking cessation clinic.

methodsThis study used a retrospectively identified cohort with a one-time long-term telephone outcome assessment. Medical records of adults aged ≥ 60 years who attended a smoking cessation outpatient clinic between January 2015 and March 2020 were reviewed, and telephone follow-up was conducted in October 2024, approximately 4.6-9.8 years after clinic attendance. The primary outcome was self-reported smoking status at interview. Recorded treatment modality reflected the treatment plan documented at baseline; medication initiation, duration, and adherence were not available. Multivariable analyses were exploratory.

resultsOf 297 eligible participants, 26 (8.8%) were recorded as deceased. Among the remaining 271 participants, 97 (35.8%) were interviewed. Of these 97 respondents, 35 (36.1%) reported that they were not currently smoking at interview, representing a respondent-only estimate. Under extreme-case assumptions for the 174 non-contacted participants, the proportion not currently smoking ranged from 12.9% to 77.1%. Forty-three respondents (44.3%) reported a longest smoking-free period of ≥ 12 months, although its timing relative to follow-up was unknown. No robust association between recorded treatment modality and smoking status was identified: the overall respondent-only model was not statistically significant, and the treatment-modality association was not retained in the extreme-case sensitivity analysis. Among the 62 respondents currently smoking, 50 (80.6%) expressed willingness to receive support for another quit attempt.

conclusionsLong-term smoking-status estimates were substantially limited by loss to follow-up and should be interpreted as respondent-only findings rather than as an abstinence rate for the original cohort. The treatment-modality analyses were exploratory and do not support comparative treatment-effectiveness conclusions. The high willingness to attempt quitting again among respondents who were still smoking highlights the potential for continued re-engagement with cessation care in later life.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSmokingTelephoneFollow-upNicotine dependenceOlder adultsPrimary careSmokingTobacco use cessation

Identifiers

PMID42754847
PMCPMC13584357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.