ReviewThe Korean journal of pain2026
Psychiatric screening and initial management in interventional pain practice: a narrative review and the Daradia Protocol.
Review in The Korean journal of pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychiatric comorbidities are common in chronic pain and can meaningfully influence safety, satisfaction, adherence, and durability of benefit after interventional pain procedures. Interventional pain physicians, typically trained in anesthesiology, often have limited time and limited access to liaison psychiatry, creating a gap between guideline intent and real-world feasibility. This narrative review summarizes clinically relevant psychiatric domains for interventional pain practice, highlights situations where procedures should proceed, be optimized in parallel, or be deferred, and outlines a pragmatic approach to screening and first-line management in busy clinics. The authors describe brief screening tools, including validated instruments where applicable, that can be implemented within routine workflow to identify depression, anxiety, suicidality, substance misuse risk, and maladaptive coping, and they propose the Daradia Protocol, a structured 10-minute stepped-care pathway that stratifies patients into Green, Amber, and Red risk categories to guide procedural decision-making and referral urgency. Clinic-initiated strategies emphasize psychoeducation, expectation alignment, graded activity, sleep support, and coordinated care with mental health professionals when indicated. Embedding rapid screening with clear action thresholds may strengthen informed consent, improve patient selection, and increase the likelihood of durable outcomes without materially extending consultation time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.