ReviewNeurology and therapy2026
Benzodiazepines in Epilepsy: A US Perspective on Clinical Use, Pharmacology, Abuse Methods, and Public Health Considerations.
Review in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are indicated for a range of therapeutic conditions and can improve patient outcomes when used appropriately. The role of BZDs in epilepsy management is essential in that they have long been first-line agents for acute seizure cessation, most notably including status epilepticus, with each BZD offering a unique pharmacokinetic profile. BZDs are commonly used to treat seizures because of their rapid onset, pronounced safety and tolerability profiles, and versatility of dosage forms and available routes of administration. Despite their clinical utility in a variety of therapeutic areas for a wide range of conditions, the potential for BZD misuse and abuse remains a topic of public health concern. Particularly in combination with other central nervous system depressants (e.g., opioids, gabapentin, and alcohol), misuse and abuse of BZDs are linked to serious and potentially fatal complications. As such, the US Food and Drug Administration has issued a boxed warning regarding concurrent use of BZDs and opioids, emphasizing the dangers of co-prescribing. Policies and prescribing safeguards are implemented to regulate and promote safe use of BZDs; however, such measures may unintentionally worsen patient care by limiting access for individuals that benefit from therapy for seizure control. The objective of this paper is to identify a practical balance between ensuring access to these essential medications for those who experience clinical benefit while also supporting safe prescribing of BZDs to minimize misuse and abuse. Findings from the present review support continued research, drug utilization policies, and patient education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42754811What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.