ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Language proficiency drives listening-related fatigue in those who communicate in English as their second language.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals who listen to speech in their second language ('L2 listeners') are disproportionately impacted by adverse acoustic conditions; a phenomenon coined the 'non-native speech-in-noise disadvantage'. Evidence also suggests that L2 listening taxes cognitive resources to a greater extent than in L1 listeners. Very little, however, is known about the longer-term consequences of this sustained cognitive engagement. Listening-related fatigue refers to the daily life subjective experience of extreme tiredness from effortful listening. The current study recruited a large sample of L2-English listeners (N = 256) to explore factors that predict listening-related fatigue. Approximately half of this sample (n = 126) reported an Indo-European (IE) language (e.g., Italian) as their first language, whereas the other half (n = 130) reported a non-Indo-European (non-IE) language (e.g., Vietnamese) as their first language. Non-IE L2 listeners reported higher overall listening-related fatigue than both IE L2 listeners and a group of monolingual English-speakers (L1-English). Self-rated proficiency and objective vocabulary scores were significant predictors of L2 listening-related fatigue and they moderated the effect of L2 use on listening-related fatigue; individuals who reported increased L2 use were more likely to experience increased fatigue, but only if their self-rated proficiency was low or moderate or their vocabulary score was low. Exploratory mediation analysis suggested that the effect of the L2 listener group (IE vs. non-IE) on listening-related fatigue was attributable to lower self-rated proficiency and objective vocabulary in the non-IE L2 group. To conclude, language proficiency appears to be a strong determinant of listening-related fatigue in L2-English listeners. When L2-English proficiency is low, increased L2-English usage is associated with heightened listening-related fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.