ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Forage cactus as a substitute for ground corn in sugarcane-based diets for lactating dairy cows.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstracThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of replacing ground corn meal with forage cactus Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. in sugarcane-based diets on the performance of lactating dairy cows. Ten Holstein cows, with an average milk yield of 20 ± 0.9 kg day⁻¹, body weight of 592.5 ± 24.3 kg, and 15.5 ± 2.5 weeks in milk, were used and distributed into two simultaneous 5 × 5 Latin squares. The treatments consisted of levels of replacement of ground corn meal with forage cactus (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100%). Replacement linearly reduced (P < 0.05) the intake of dry matter, crude protein, organic matter, non-fibrous carbohydrates and total digestible nutrients. Apparent nutrient digestibility was not affected by the replacement (P > 0.05). Milk yield not corrected to 3.5% fat decreased linearly (P = 0.002) with increasing replacement levels (18.33 and 16.25 kg day⁻¹ at 0 and 100%, respectively), whereas milk fat content increased linearly (P = 0.035) from 3.65 to 4.14%. Fat-corrected milk yield (3.5% FCM; 18.46 kg), as well as milk protein (3.42%), lactose (4.42%), total solids (12.61%) and feed efficiency (0.99 kg fat-corrected milk per kg of dry matter intake), were not affected (P > 0.05). Forage cactus can partially replace corn in diets for dairy cows fed sugarcane-based diets. However, replacing corn with forage cactus reduces dry matter and nutrient intake and milk yield not corrected for fat, although it results in significant increases in milk fat content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42754798What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.