ArticlePharmaceutical research2026
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Inhaled Polymyxin B: From Rabbit Optimization to Human Predictions.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDespite the potential of aerosolized polymyxin B (PMB) to enhance local lung exposure while minimizing nephrotoxicity in multidrug-resistant pneumonia, clinical adoption remains limited by insufficient inhaled pharmacokinetic (PK) data. This study developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling framework to translate preclinical PK data from rabbits to humans and coupled it with a mechanism-based pharmacodynamic model to define optimal inhaled PMB regimens.
methodsA whole-body PBPK model was developed using plasma and tissue concentration data following subcutaneous and intratracheal PMB administration (2 mg/kg) in rabbits, extrapolated to humans using allometric scaling, and validated against clinical plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) data. Monte Carlo simulations evaluated the probability of PK/PD target attainment (PTA) and probability of toxicity attainment (PToXA).
resultsIntratracheal administration achieved ~ 10.4-fold higher lung exposure relative to subcutaneous dosing while reducing kidney exposure by 27.7%. A plasma exposure threshold of 92.9 mg·h/L and a kidney tissue exposure threshold of 157 mg·h/L were identified as indicators of higher risk of AKI. Inhaled PMB monotherapy achieved favorable ELF PTA with 0% PToXA and predicted substantial bacterial load reduction (≥ 4 log
conclusionInhaled PMB provides superior site-specific exposure with minimal predicted nephrotoxicity. Our PBPK-mechanism-based modeling framework suggests that nebulized PMB rapidly clears bacteria while avoiding dose-limiting nephrotoxicity associated with intravenous therapy. These findings support advancing aerosolized PMB toward clinical implementation as a precision-dosing strategy for MDR pulmonary infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42754780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.