ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Characterizing intradural spinal metastasis in the metastatic cascade: clinical course, dissemination timing, and molecular features in 69 patients.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMetastatic cancers to the central nervous system (CNS) usually affect the brain, but a small and clinically significant portion also affect the intradural spinal space. Here, we characterize the molecular features of metastatic intradural spinal disease and describe the metastatic chronology and timeline such cancers go through to reach this space.
methodsAll patients with MRI spine findings of intramedullary or leptomeningeal lesions from 2020-2025 at a tertiary academic center were screened. Patients with primary CNS cancer or non-cancer diagnoses were excluded. Demographic information, imaging findings, dates of primary cancer and metastasis detection, and molecular data across disease sites were collected. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) after primary diagnosis.
results69 patients met inclusion criteria out of 1401 patients screened. The most common primary pathologies were lung (33.3%) and breast (31.9%). 11.6% of patients underwent surgery for intradural disease. The distribution of intradural spine disease on initial detection was 55.1% cervical, 65.2% thoracic, and 76.8% lumbar. The mortality rate was 87.0% within a median follow-up of 42.0 (IQR 20.6-72.9) months after primary cancer diagnosis. The median time to any metastasis was 0.5 (0-6.7), to the brain was 14.9 (0.6-42.7), to the osseous spine was 19.4 (0.7-38.9), and to the intradural spine was 29.5 (14.0-52.6) months. Targetable mutations were noted in 46.4% of primary lesions and such patients trended towards improved OS (51.7 months, 31.2-105.2) compared to patients without (30.1 months, 12.6-58.9, p = 0.072). This difference was driven by patients with such biomarkers qualifying for targeted therapies, which demonstrated improved OS (56.2 vs 31.2 months, p = 0.029).
conclusionTargetable biomarkers are present in nearly 50% of primary lesions for patients who develop spinal intradural disease, and regular molecular characterization and sequencing of this space (e.g. CSF liquid biopsy) could have a clinically meaningful impact on these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42754719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.