Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42754696›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2026

How perceiving pace of social change affects loneliness: psychological obsolescence as predictor for loneliness in late-life sample.

Nora M Degen, Frieder R Lang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nora M DegenInstitute of Psychogerontology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2096-4277
Frieder R LangInstitute of Psychogerontology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany. frieder.lang@fau.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-1619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A specific challenge of later life relates to the perceived pace of social change (i.e., psychological obsolescence), which may contribute to enhanced feelings of loneliness. In a 2-year longitudinal study with two measurement occasions (i.e., 2021 and 2023), data were collected from N = 818 adults aged 75 years and older (M = 80.99, SD = 4.07, range = 75-95 years). Participants were recruited from an urban area in southern Germany. A baseline-adjusted autoregressive path model was used to examine the concurrent association of psychological obsolescence with baseline loneliness and its prospective association with follow-up loneliness, accounting for baseline loneliness. Loneliness was assessed using the 6-item De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale and modeled as a manifest variable. Perceived obsolescence was significantly associated with baseline loneliness, with higher loneliness observed among individuals reporting greater psychological obsolescence. At follow-up, psychological obsolescence also showed a significant prospective association with loneliness after accounting for baseline loneliness. Over the two-year period, loneliness demonstrated substantial temporal stability. Among the covariates, being socially isolated and not being in a partnership were associated with higher follow-up loneliness. Overall, the findings suggest that, in later life, perceiving oneself as out of touch with the times is associated with higher loneliness both concurrently and prospectively, beyond the effects of prior loneliness and other established covariates.

Indexed as

LonelinessLongitudinalPsychological obsolescenceSocial change

Identifiers

PMID42754696
PMCPMC13586106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.