ReviewNature human behaviour2026
The future of large-scale experiments and their challenges in the digital era.
Review in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale randomized experiments involving millions of observations have transformed social science across academic and applied domains. These methods are now widely used in fields ranging from economics and political science to public health, education and digital product development. Drawing on the experience of industry practitioners and academic collaborators, this Perspective outlines six areas where the expanding scale and scope of experimental studies have introduced new challenges. We describe open problems related to organizational incentives and experimental governance; privacy, fairness and ethics; long-term impact estimation; time-adaptive experimental studies; heterogeneous treatment effects; and generative artificial intelligence. For each area, we summarize recent methodological advances, highlight ongoing limitations and suggest directions for future work. Our goal is to surface practical challenges that merit greater attention from the research community and to encourage sustained collaboration between academics and practitioners in shaping the future of experimental studies.
Identifiers
42754695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.