ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Neighborhoods matter: contextual determinants of bariatric surgery utilization and weight loss in Washington, D.C.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBariatric surgery is the most effective durable treatment for severe obesity, yet neighborhood context may shape both progression to surgery and the ability to sustain postoperative health behaviors. We examined bariatric surgery utilization and postoperative body mass index (BMI) change in relation to tract-level food insecurity and neighborhood vulnerability in Washington, DC.
methodsRetrospective EHR-based cohort study of adult Washington, DC residents with BMI data and census tract linkage (2020-2023). Bariatric referral/order, consultation, and completed surgery were identified; BMI measures were linked to tract-level indicators of food insecurity, poverty, social vulnerability, and deprivation. We compared surgical and non-surgical patients; mapped tract-level BMI change using choropleth maps; identified space-time clusters of utilization using retrospective scan statistics; and compared social determinants between high- and low-utilization clusters using analysis of variance.
resultsAmong 41,617 adult obese DC residents, 1,129 (2.7%) had a bariatric referral/order, 1,952 (4.7%) had a bariatric consultation, and 472 (1.1%) underwent surgery. Surgical patients were predominantly Black/African American (90%); concentrated in Wards 5 (31%), 7 (34%), and 8 (30%). Tract-level BMI patterns were more favorable among surgical than non-surgical patients. Space-time analysis identified two high- and two low-utilization clusters. Compared with low-utilization clusters, high-utilization clusters had higher food insecurity (88.1 vs. 5.4%; p < 0.001), poverty (81.0 vs. 27.6%; p < 0.001), uninsured rates (5.1 vs. 2.4%; p < 0.001), and overall social vulnerability (10.5 vs. 5.8; p < 0.001), Neighborhood Deprivation Index (1.533 vs. - 0.721); all four SVI subdomains were higher (p < 0.001, except housing type and transportation, p = 0.019).
conclusionBariatric surgery utilization clustered in neighborhoods with high structural and social vulnerability and postoperative BMI reduction was observed across neighborhoods. Incorporating neighborhood context into bariatric care may help identify areas for targeted referral, access support, and postoperative resource allocation to promote equitable treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42754629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.