Articlenpj aging2026
Validation and refinement of a biomarker panel for frailty assessment and prediction of muscle weakness in older adults.
Article in npj aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frailty is a complex geriatric syndrome characterized by age-related declines in physiological function and cognitive reserve. To promote early prevention and intervention, minimally invasive and objective biomarkers that can detect frailty progression are required. We aimed to identify biomarkers associated with frailty progression and to elucidate their relevance to the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study (J-CHS) criteria, consist of five components (unintentional weight loss, self-reported exhaustion, muscle weakness, slow walking speed, and low physical activity). A total of 168 individuals (61 robust, 25 pre-frail, and 82 frail) enrolled in the NCGG (National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology) Biobank were analyzed. Clinical information, blood-test data, aging-related factors, and gene-expression data were integrated for the analysis. First, linear regression identified one clinical factor, five aging-related factors, and 251 gene-expression factors associated with frailty. Subsequent logistic regression analyses examining each J-CHS components highlighted six candidate biomarkers. Cross-validation further suggested that three of these biomarkers-SMI, apelin, and GDF15-may represent potential biomarkers. Finally, retrospective and prospective analyses further demonstrated that those biomarkers were predictive of future muscle weakness, yielding a concordance index of 0.70. In conclusion, we validated and refined a biomarker panel consisting of SMI, apelin, and GDF15 that is associated with frailty, particularly muscle weakness (a major J-CHS component). These biomarkers may be useful for frailty assessment. Longitudinal analyses further suggested that they may be associated with the future development of muscle weakness in initially robust older adults, although validation in larger prospective cohorts is warranted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.