ArticleNature communications2026
ALPaCA: Adapting Llama for Pathology Context Analysis to enable slide-level question answering.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly used in computational pathology for image classification, description generation, question answering and interactive diagnostics. However, most pathology LVLMs analyse small regions of interest rather than pyramidal, gigapixel-scale whole-slide images (WSIs), limiting their use for tasks requiring whole-slide assessment across sub-regions and magnification levels. Here, we present ALPaCA (Adapting Llama for Pathology Context Analysis), a slide-level LVLM framework for WSI question answering across diverse cancer types and tissue sites. ALPaCA is trained using 35,913 WSIs with curated descriptions and 341,051 question-answer pairs from TCGA and GTEx. It combines a LongFormer vision-text adaptor with a Gaussian mixture model-based prototyping adaptor and Llama3.1. ALPaCA exceeds 90% accuracy on internal close-ended benchmarks and maintains 77-82% accuracy on independent external cohorts. Expert pathologist evaluation of open-ended responses supports its slide-level reasoning capability. Additionally, ALPaCA can be fine-tuned on organ- or disease-specific datasets, supporting specialised pathology question answering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.