Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42754516›Full record

ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2026

Optimizing multiple diagnostic modalities for small bowel evaluation: a strategic approach.

Dong Jun Oh, Yun Jeong Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dong Jun OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
Yun Jeong LimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea. drlimyj@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the small bowel, once considered a diagnostic "blind spot," has become fully and comprehensively accessible. This review summarizes recent advances in the main diagnostic modalities: capsule endoscopy (CE), device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), computed tomography enterography (CTE), magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), and intestinal ultrasound (IUS). CE provides a noninvasive assessment of mucosal abnormalities, whereas DAE offers the added benefits of tissue sampling and therapeutic intervention. CTE and MRE provide complementary cross-sectional information on mural inflammation, strictures, and extraintestinal involvement. IUS has emerged as a valuable, radiation-free technique for repeated bedside monitoring. We review the diagnostic performance, strengths, and limitations of each modality in key clinical scenarios, including suspected small bowel bleeding, Crohn's disease, and tumors. Finally, we highlight the importance of an integrated, patient-centered approach to optimize the evaluation of small bowel disease and to guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Intestinal DiseasesIntestine, SmallCapsule EndoscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyBalloon enteroscopyCapsule endoscopyDiagnostic imagingSmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID42754516
PMCPMC13585677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.