ArticleBone & joint research2026
A pile foundation reconstruction prosthesis for severe acetabular bone defects : principle, design, and mechanical analysis.
Article in Bone & joint research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Severe acetabular bone defects generally refer to Paprosky III defects and pelvic discontinuity. Reconstruction surgery for these is complex, and requires innovative strategies to address implant failure and reconstruct the acetabulum. Traditional reconstruction methods rely on the acetabular inner surface bone stock for prosthetic support, which sometimes proves inadequate for reconstructing severe acetabular bone defects. This study proposes a pile foundation reconstruction prosthesis (PFRP) that stabilizes the acetabular component by means of pile screws anchored in the deep periacetabular bone stock, offering a promising solution for addressing severe acetabular bone defects. Methods: This article elucidates the fundamental principles, design, fabrication, and implantation technique of the PFRP, and verifies its mechanical stability through finite element analysis (FEA) and biomechanical testing, exploring its biomechanical characteristics. Results: Initial FEA of the prosthesis determined that the posterior iliac pile and the pubic pile serve as the primary load-bearing components. Furthermore, a minimum triangular configuration of the posterior iliac pile, pubic pile, and ischial pile is required to stably support the acetabular component. Through fatigue mechanical testing and FEA, the efficacy of the PFRP in reconstructing Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects has been validated. Furthermore, a cluster analysis was performed on a historical cohort of 137 acetabular revision cases, categorizing the bone defects into four distinct types. The effectiveness of the PFRP was validated by applying it to the most severe defect within each category, thereby demonstrating its broad clinical applicability. Conclusion: The PFRP exhibits excellent stability. The three-pile fundamental configuration can stably reconstruct acetabular bone defects of various severities. This represents a promising novel strategy for reconstructing acetabular bone defects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.