Observational studyLupus science & medicine2026
Measurement properties of the FATIGUE-PRO in patients with SLE in real-world settings.
Observational study in Lupus science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFatigue is a common, multifaceted symptom in SLE which is difficult to treat. There has been a lack of broadly accepted SLE-specific assessment tools for fatigue. This study assessed the psychometric properties of the FATIGUE-PRO, a new patient-reported outcome measure, in patients with SLE in real-world clinical outpatient settings (Birmingham, UK, and Düsseldorf, Germany).
methodsPatients with SLE aged ≥18 years from cross-sectional, observational studies in Birmingham and Düsseldorf completed the three FATIGUE-PRO domains (physical fatigue, mental and cognitive fatigue and susceptibility to fatigue). Psychometric evaluation was completed using Rasch Measurement Theory and classical test theory methods. Association between the FATIGUE-PRO and other clinical outcome assessments was evaluated using Spearman's rank order correlations.
resultsOverall, 200 patients were recruited from Birmingham and 234 from Düsseldorf. The FATIGUE-PRO demonstrated consistently adequate measurement properties. Items demonstrated high levels of targeting (82-95%) and the response scale functioned as intended for most items across all domains (82-100% ordered thresholds). Domains were cohesive overall, with minimal item misfit, and demonstrated little local dependency. Principal component analysis of residuals was supportive of unidimensionality of all three domains. All domain scores were reliable and demonstrated high internal consistency reliability (0.90-0.97). Moderate-to-high correlations, supportive of construct validity, were observed between the FATIGUE-PRO scores and other patient-reported outcomes, including Lupus Quality of Life. Low correlations were seen with outcome measures such as Brief Index of Lupus Damage and clinician-reported SLE Disease Activity Index-2000.
conclusionsThe FATIGUE-PRO was demonstrated to be fit-for-purpose in real-world clinical outpatient settings, with strong measurement properties, supporting its use in the assessment of fatigue in SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.