Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42754272›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2026

Fragility fractures of the pelvis in the elderly: protocol for an international prospective multicentre observational cohort study.

Pol Maria Rommens, Alexander Joeris, Mehdi Boudissa, Gregory J Della Rocca, Christian Fang, Maximilian J Hartel, Frank Fa Ijpma, Björn Christian Link, Anser Nasir, Philipp Pieroh and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04182776 (Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04182776 active not recruitingnot on this map

Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: Observational Outcome Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAO Innovation Translation CenterRan2022 to 2027Enrolled420ConditionsPelvic Fracture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pol Maria RommensDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany pol.rommens@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5175-3876
Alexander JoerisAO Innovation Translation Center, Medical Scientific Affairs, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7748-7115
Mehdi BoudissaChirurgien des Hôpitaux Traumatologie des membres et du squelette axial, TIMC-IMAG, La Tronche, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.
Gregory J Della RoccaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Christian FangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Maximilian J HartelDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-2878
Frank Fa IjpmaDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Björn Christian LinkCantonal Hospital Lucerne Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Anser NasirCenter for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Philipp PierohDepartment for Orthopedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Naofumi ShiotaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Okayama Prefecture, Japan.
Geoff WilkinDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel WagnerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) are low-energy osteoporotic fractures that primarily affect elderly patients. They are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and healthcare burden, and their incidence continues to rise as the global population ages. Despite the availability of dedicated classification systems and advances in surgical techniques, high-quality evidence to guide optimal management remains limited, and treatment algorithms are not standardised. To address these gaps, we established an international, observational cohort study designed to collect comprehensive data on patients with FFP and varying degrees of pelvic instability. The study aims to evaluate outcomes of non-operative and operative management and to identify predictors of favourable outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This international, prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study will enrol approximately 420 patients aged ≥65 years with FFP (types II-IV) over a 4-year period at 10 large AO Trauma centres in the USA, Canada, Japan, Hong Kong, France, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Germany. Patients will be followed for up to 12 months. Data collected will include fracture characteristics, treatment details, radiological and functional outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, mortality and procedure-related adverse events. All treatments will adhere to the standard of care at each participating centre. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the responsible ethics committee at each participating site before recruitment. All patients will be enrolled following an informed consent process approved by the relevant ethics committee. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04182776.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesPelvic BonesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesResearch DesignFractures, BoneGERIATRIC MEDICINEPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPelvic BonesTrauma managementTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42754272
PMCPMC13599908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.