ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026
New approach methodologies in neurotherapeutics development.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) offer substantial opportunities to transform neurotherapeutics discovery, optimization, and development, reducing the timeline to translate central nervous system (CNS) innovations to patients. Strategically deployed, NAMs enhance the predictive value of preclinical studies for human outcomes while reducing reliance on animal models. Current scientific community interest focuses particularly on human-based and -derived systems, in silico and AI-driven models, and advanced microphysiological platforms, reflecting a shift toward human-centric drug development paradigms. Despite this momentum, significant challenges remain, including NAM reproducibility and validation, the establishment of standardized performance criteria, data sharing, and the evolution of regulatory frameworks needed to enable consistent adoption across the neurotherapeutics continuum. Nevertheless, there is a rich history of developing and adopting methodologies, particularly for improving the prediction of neurotherapeutic safety profiles while reducing animal use, and for advancing understanding of drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier, and the assessment of adverse neurological effects. These advances have begun to influence regulatory decision-making and are increasingly reflected in guidance and review practices. Furthermore, NAMs are showing concrete impact in neurological disorders, including Epilepsy, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease, where human-relevant models and computational approaches support more precise characterization of disease mechanisms and therapeutic responses. In this paper, we examine the current and emerging roles of NAMs in neurotherapeutics development from government, academia, and industry perspectives, highlight key opportunities and limitations, and discuss the scientific, technical, and regulatory steps required to fully realize their potential in accelerating safe and effective CNS therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.