Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42753291›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026

New approach methodologies in neurotherapeutics development.

Amir P Tamiz, Szczepan W Baran, Thomas Hartung, Wendy W Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir P TamizDivision of Translational Research, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD, 20852, USA. Electronic address: amir.tamiz@nih.gov.
Szczepan W BaranSzczepan Baran, Chief Scientific Officer, Instem, 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1450, Boston, MA, 02199, USA.
Thomas HartungDoerenkamp-Zbinden Professor and Chair for Evidence-based Toxicology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Wendy W WuDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) offer substantial opportunities to transform neurotherapeutics discovery, optimization, and development, reducing the timeline to translate central nervous system (CNS) innovations to patients. Strategically deployed, NAMs enhance the predictive value of preclinical studies for human outcomes while reducing reliance on animal models. Current scientific community interest focuses particularly on human-based and -derived systems, in silico and AI-driven models, and advanced microphysiological platforms, reflecting a shift toward human-centric drug development paradigms. Despite this momentum, significant challenges remain, including NAM reproducibility and validation, the establishment of standardized performance criteria, data sharing, and the evolution of regulatory frameworks needed to enable consistent adoption across the neurotherapeutics continuum. Nevertheless, there is a rich history of developing and adopting methodologies, particularly for improving the prediction of neurotherapeutic safety profiles while reducing animal use, and for advancing understanding of drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier, and the assessment of adverse neurological effects. These advances have begun to influence regulatory decision-making and are increasingly reflected in guidance and review practices. Furthermore, NAMs are showing concrete impact in neurological disorders, including Epilepsy, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease, where human-relevant models and computational approaches support more precise characterization of disease mechanisms and therapeutic responses. In this paper, we examine the current and emerging roles of NAMs in neurotherapeutics development from government, academia, and industry perspectives, highlight key opportunities and limitations, and discuss the scientific, technical, and regulatory steps required to fully realize their potential in accelerating safe and effective CNS therapies.

Indexed as

Neurotherapeutics developmentNeurotherapeutics discoveryNew approach methodologiesRegulatoryReproducibility and validation

Identifiers

PMID42753291
PMCPMC13602054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.