ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026
"Updates on diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers of CNS tumors".
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis and classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors has undergone a paradigm shift over the past decade, evolving from a purely histology-based approach to an integrated framework that incorporates molecular and epigenetic features. This review summarizes recent updates in key genomic and epigenomic biomarkers across major CNS tumor categories, with a focus on their diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. DNA methylation profiling has emerged as a valuable tool for tumor classification, subgrouping, and grading, complementing traditional histopathologic assessment. Across diffuse gliomas, newly characterized molecular alterations have refined grading criteria and clarified the boundaries between tumor types, including important caveats about the use of individual molecular features as sole diagnostic criteria. In ependymomas, medulloblastomas, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors, meningiomas, pineal tumors, and embryonal tumors, methylation profiling now defines biologically and clinically meaningful subgroups that inform risk stratification and treatment selection. The emerging recognition of mismatch repair-deficient gliomas and fusion-driven tumor entities further underscores the expanding complexity of CNS tumor taxonomy. As molecular technologies continue to advance, the integration of genomic, epigenomic, histopathologic, and clinical data will be essential to improving diagnostic precision, guiding therapy, and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.