ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Cultural Competence Among Optometry Students at a South African University: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCultural competence is an essential dimension of contemporary health care delivery, particularly in diverse, multicultural societies. South Africa, with its rich linguistic and cultural plurality, presents a unique context in which culturally responsive care is critical for equitable health outcomes. Despite growing international attention to cultural competence in health professions education, little research has explored this domain within optometry education in sub-Saharan Africa.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess self-reported levels of cultural competence, specifically preparedness, skillfulness, and educational exposure, among third- and fourth-year optometry students at a South African university.
methodsA descriptive, cross-sectional survey design was used. An adapted version of the Harvard Cross-Cultural Care Survey was distributed via Google Forms to 91 eligible students, yielding 68 (74.7%) responses. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in SPSS (version 29). Qualitative responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis.
resultsParticipants reported high preparedness for caring for immigrant patients (47/68, 69.1%) and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, and asexual (LGBTIQA+) patients (45/68, 66.2%), but low preparedness for patients with religious beliefs affecting treatment (only 20/68, 29.4% prepared) or health beliefs at odds with Western medicine (21/68, 30.9% prepared). Regarding skills, students felt most capable of assessing illness understanding (58/68, 85.3% skilled) and identifying English literacy (56/68, 82.4% skilled) but reported deficits in counseling patients about traditional and alternative medicine use (45/68, 66.2% lacking adequate skill) and identifying religious beliefs affecting care (42/68, 61.8% lacking adequate skill). Experiential learning, particularly community outreach and the Phelophepa Healthcare Train, was identified as the most impactful preparation for cross-cultural care. Content analysis identified 6 categories related to cross-cultural learning experiences: exposure to diverse patient populations, communication across cultures, developing cultural awareness and empathy, awareness of health inequities, informal and social learning, and gaps in structured training.
conclusionsThe optometry students demonstrated moderate cultural competence, with meaningful strengths in communication and rapport-building, alongside notable gaps in engaging with religious beliefs, traditional medicine, and systemic health inequities. These findings align with international literature and underscore the need for structured, curriculum-embedded cultural competence training. We recommend the integration of formal training modules, reflective practice frameworks, faculty development, and expanded equitable access to diverse clinical placements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42753259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.