Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42753250›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

When Innovation Leaves People Behind: Reframing Accountability in Commercial Digital Health.

Hajira Dambha-Miller, Lucy Smith, Lysanne Veerle Michels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hajira Dambha-MillerPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, England, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom, 44 (0)23 8059 ext 5000.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-443X
Lucy SmithPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, England, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom, 44 (0)23 8059 ext 5000.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7658-5522
Lysanne Veerle MichelsPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, England, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom, 44 (0)23 8059 ext 5000.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6071-2567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Digital technologies are increasingly integrated across health care systems; however, accumulating evidence shows that these tools often perform unevenly across population groups. Biases in AI-enabled tools can reinforce existing health inequities, particularly when systems are developed and validated using datasets that exclude underserved populations. Studies demonstrate systematic underestimation of illness severity, diagnostic inaccuracies, and measurement bias affecting ethnic minority groups, rural populations, people with disabilities, people experiencing homelessness, and other groups with limited access to health care. These disparities highlight structural vulnerabilities in the data that inform machine learning systems, where socially patterned access to care shapes what is recorded and therefore learned. Commercial adoption patterns further exacerbate inequities due to socioeconomic gradients in digital engagement and a lack of accountability measures for adherence to regulatory frameworks within National Health Service procurement processes. In this Viewpoint, we argue that ensuring accountability in digital health care requires transparent reporting of subgroup performance, representative development of datasets, and ongoing monitoring of distributional impacts. Achieving equitable and reliable digital health care demands regulatory and methodological standards that prioritize fairness and generalizability within the commercialization sector and are monitored across the pre- and postdeployment life cycle.

Indexed as

Digital HealthDigital TechnologySocial ResponsibilityHumansbiasdigital healthhealth careinequitypublic health

Identifiers

PMID42753250
PMCPMC13585304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.