ArticleChemSusChem2026
Design for Remanufacturing and Resource Circulation in Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis Systems Using Sustainability Benefit Ratio.
Article in ChemSusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is a promising route to low-carbon hydrogen production, but its sustainability remains incomplete unless the electrolyzer itself is designed for circularity. Repeated stack replacement can impose substantial lifecycle burdens because PEMWE relies on resource-intensive components such as iridium-based anodes, fluorinated polymer membranes, and titanium-based stack materials. Here, we investigate the significance of introducing remanufacturing into PEMWE systems from the perspective of design for remanufacturing and resource circulation. Repeated new-manufacturing and repeated remanufacturing scenarios are compared using the Sustainability Benefit Ratio (SBR), a lifecycle-oriented indicator that integrates greenhouse-gas burdens, avoided burdens, and valuation-weighted lifecycle factors into a unified circular-economy metric. The results show that remanufacturing consistently improves the cumulative environmental-economic balance relative to repeated new manufacturing, reduces carbon-footprint-based burdens, and enables repeated circulation of valuable stack-related resources while maintaining comparable hydrogen output. Cost decomposition and sensitivity analysis further reveal that the OER electrode governs the circular value of PEMWE remanufacturing and that its contribution can be translated into practical design targets in terms of catalyst cost, remanufacturing cost, recovery ratio, and electrochemical performance. These findings demonstrate that SBR can serve as a practical design-support tool for quantifying circular-economy value and guiding remanufacturing-oriented PEMWE development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.