ArticleEcology2026
From environmental heterogeneity to stability: Beta-diversity stabilizes biomass across space.
Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how biodiversity influences ecosystem stability across heterogeneous landscapes is a central challenge in ecology. The spatial insurance hypothesis proposes that turnover in species composition stabilizes ecosystem processes in heterogeneous environments if species dominate in the habitats to which they are best adapted. Yet, empirical evidence remains mixed, partly due to confounding factors and overlooked causal mechanisms. We combined metacommunity simulations and a field experiment with marine benthic communities to test how β-diversity (species turnover) affects the spatial stability of biomass (its invariability among sites at a single point in time). The simulations, which varied the strength of selection via niche overlap, revealed that turnover enhanced spatial stability of biomass in scenarios with low to medium niche overlap, but only when environmental heterogeneity was statistically accounted for. This stabilizing effect weakened when species' niches were broader. In our field experiment, high turnover similarly mitigated the negative impact of environmental heterogeneity on spatial stability. Together, these results provide strong support for the spatial insurance hypothesis, demonstrating that species turnover can stabilize ecosystem functioning across heterogeneous landscapes. Crucially, failing to account for environmental heterogeneity can mask this effect, leading to the mistaken conclusion that turnover has a neutral or destabilizing effect. Our study highlights the importance of a causal framework that disentangles the effects of environmental heterogeneity and β-diversity, helping to resolve previous inconsistencies and advance a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity-stability relationships at landscape scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.