ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026
What is new in Rome V?: Redefining diagnostic criteria and clinical pathways in disorders of gut-brain interaction.
Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomarkers in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Bridging Gut-Brain Mechanisms to Precision Care.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Rome-V criteria represent a major evolution in the conceptualization and clinical application of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs). Building upon the biologically grounded framework established in Rome IV, Rome V moves beyond rigid symptom-based definitions toward a multi-dimensional, clinically operational model that integrates symptom patterns, temporal characteristics, physiological testing and psycho-social context. A central advance is the transition from categorical classification to dimensional phenotyping, recognizing the continuum and overlap inherent to DGBIs. The recalibration of diagnostic thresholds, most notably the re-introduction of abdominal discomfort and the requirement for symptom intermittency in irritable bowel syndrome, restores diagnostic sensitivity while improving mechanistic specificity. Rome V further introduces Rome Clinical Criteria, addressing the substantial sub-diagnostic population and enabling earlier, context-driven diagnosis in routine practice. Across organ systems, diagnostic definitions are refined to align more closely with underlying pathophysiology and clinical decision-making. This is exemplified by the integration of physiological frameworks in esophageal disorders, temporal stratification in gastroduodenal syndromes, the redefinition of centrally mediated abdominal pain and the incorporation of motor-sensory phenotyping in anorectal disorders. In parallel, Rome V emphasizes harm reduction in biliary disorders and introduces greater continuity across pediatric and adult frameworks. Despite these advances, challenges remain, including the absence of validated biomarkers, variability in global applicability and the need for further validation of new constructs. Overall, Rome V represents a shift from static diagnostic criteria to dynamic clinical pathways, providing a robust platform for mechanism-informed and increasingly individualized care in DGBIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42753081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.