Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42753081›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026

What is new in Rome V?: Redefining diagnostic criteria and clinical pathways in disorders of gut-brain interaction.

Manjeet Kumar Goyal, Omesh Goyal, Tanisha Sehgal, Ashita Rukmini Vuthaluru, Kartikay Goyal, Ajit Sood

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manjeet Kumar Goyal *Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH, 44311, USA.
Omesh Goyal *Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, 141 001, India. goyalomesh@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6347-0988
Tanisha SehgalDepartment of Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, 141 001, India.
Ashita Rukmini VuthaluruDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India, Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Kartikay GoyalDepartment of Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, 160 030, India.
Ajit SoodDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, 141 001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rome-V criteria represent a major evolution in the conceptualization and clinical application of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs). Building upon the biologically grounded framework established in Rome IV, Rome V moves beyond rigid symptom-based definitions toward a multi-dimensional, clinically operational model that integrates symptom patterns, temporal characteristics, physiological testing and psycho-social context. A central advance is the transition from categorical classification to dimensional phenotyping, recognizing the continuum and overlap inherent to DGBIs. The recalibration of diagnostic thresholds, most notably the re-introduction of abdominal discomfort and the requirement for symptom intermittency in irritable bowel syndrome, restores diagnostic sensitivity while improving mechanistic specificity. Rome V further introduces Rome Clinical Criteria, addressing the substantial sub-diagnostic population and enabling earlier, context-driven diagnosis in routine practice. Across organ systems, diagnostic definitions are refined to align more closely with underlying pathophysiology and clinical decision-making. This is exemplified by the integration of physiological frameworks in esophageal disorders, temporal stratification in gastroduodenal syndromes, the redefinition of centrally mediated abdominal pain and the incorporation of motor-sensory phenotyping in anorectal disorders. In parallel, Rome V emphasizes harm reduction in biliary disorders and introduces greater continuity across pediatric and adult frameworks. Despite these advances, challenges remain, including the absence of validated biomarkers, variability in global applicability and the need for further validation of new constructs. Overall, Rome V represents a shift from static diagnostic criteria to dynamic clinical pathways, providing a robust platform for mechanism-informed and increasingly individualized care in DGBIs.

Indexed as

Biopsychosocial modelBrain-gut axisDefecation disordersDisorders of gut-brain interactionFunctional dyspepsiaFunctional esophageal disordersGastrointestinal microbiomeGastrointestinal motilityIrritable bowel syndromeNeurogastroenterologyPatient-reported outcome measuresPrecision medicineQuality-of-lifeVisceral hypersensitivity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.