ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Neuropathological diagnoses and age-related differences in Finnish medico-legal autopsies of individuals aged 65 years and older.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on: Neuropathological diagnoses and age-related differences in Finnish medico-legal autopsies of individuals aged 65 years and older.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As populations worldwide continue to grow older, an increase in cases involving aged individuals is also to be expected in medico-legal autopsies. The aim of this study was to report the neuropathological diagnoses of individuals aged ≥ 65 years, and to compare the findings across three age groups: youngest-olds (65-74 years of age), middle-olds (75-84) and oldest-olds (≥ 85). The sample comprised all Finnish medico-legal autopsies of individuals aged ≥ 65 years whose autopsy included a full neuropathological examination performed by a neuropathologist over the period 2016-2022 (n = 629). Neuropathological diagnoses were obtained from the neuropathologists' reports, and background characteristics were collected from medico-legal cause-of-death investigation documents. Of all cases, 97.1% received at least one neuropathological diagnosis. The prevalences of many neurodegenerative diseases increased with age; Alzheimer's disease neuropathological change (30.5%) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (14.0%) were the most common ones. However, some rarer neurodegenerative diseases were more frequent among youngest-olds. While the prevalence of acute infarcts remained relatively consistent across the age groups (12.4-14.5%), old infarcts and subarachnoid haemorrhages were most common among oldest-olds (22.1% and 16.6%, respectively). The age-related increase in subarachnoid haemorrhage diagnoses appeared to be primarily driven by the male sex. The prevalences of acute and old traumatic brain injuries were rather low (5.7-6.2% and 5.1%, respectively) and remained relatively stable across the age groups. In conclusion, our data suggest that neuropathological diagnoses are highly prevalent among aged individuals undergoing medico-legal autopsy, and many diagnoses become more frequent towards oldest-olds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42753051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.