ArticleGeroScience2026
Deep learning-derived retinal age gap and its associations with lifestyle, systemic, and ocular health in a health screening cohort.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals of the same chronological age differ in biological aging, and scalable, noninvasive markers are needed. The deep learning-derived retinal age gap (RAG) is a promising measure of retinal aging, but its associations with real-world health determinants remain unclear. We developed a multi-task model to predict retinal age using 29,530 fundus images from 7535 participants in a health screening cohort and evaluated RAG in cohort A for lifestyle, socioeconomic, and systemic factors (n = 5606) and cohort B for ocular diseases (n = 1810). The bias-corrected multi-task model trained on mixed data achieved the best performance, with a mean absolute error of 2.656 years and a Pearson correlation of 0.921 in cohort A and 2.529 years and 0.938 in cohort B. Higher RAG was significantly associated with smoking (ex-smokers, β = +0.46 years; current smokers, β = +0.50 years) and with clinical diabetes (+2.52 years); both survived false discovery rate (FDR) and Bonferroni correction, and the diabetes association persisted across all sequential covariate-adjustment sets. Married participants had lower RAG (β = -0.46 years), significant after FDR correction only. Hypertension and hyperlipidemia were not associated with RAG. In cohort B, RAG was significantly higher in eyes with age-related macular degeneration (β = +0.60 years) and cataract (β = +1.86 years) than in normal controls, both surviving corrections. RAG, an imaging-derived age-prediction residual, is therefore associated with lifestyle, systemic, and ocular health. Whether it reflects biological aging requires longitudinal validation against established aging biomarkers; at present, RAG suits population-level characterization better than individual-level risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42753030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.