ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Shall we score? The SHALL-WE score for optimizing sclerotherapy in superficial lymphatic malformations.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNo standardized tool guides the decision of when to escalate beyond sclerotherapy in lymphatic malformations (LMs). We developed the SHALL-WE score (Severity, Histology, And Location-Lymphatic malformation: When to Escalate) to define the optimal sclerotherapy threshold in superficial LMs.
methodsWe analyzed 709 patients with superficial LMs from a nationwide survey in Japan. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of treatment success, used to construct the SHALL-WE score (0-3 points): head and neck location, non-cystic histology, and severe disease (1 point each). The optimal threshold was the session count beyond which success rates fell below the overall mean (63.0%).
resultsTreatment success rates decreased with increasing score (score 0: 71.6%, 1: 64.1%, 2: 43.6%, 3: 20.0%; p < 0.001). Optimal thresholds were two sessions for score 0, one for score 1, and early escalation for scores 2-3. Patients managed within thresholds had higher success rates (71.9% vs. 51.2%; adjusted OR 1.921, 95% CI 1.340-2.753, p < 0.001).
conclusionThe SHALL-WE score defines when sclerotherapy is unlikely to succeed and treatment escalation should be considered. Prospective external validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.