ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Oral Helicobacter pylori: a scoping review and pilot study on the PCR-culture detection paradox.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe role of the oral cavity as a reservoir for Helicobacter pylori remains controversial. This hybrid study, combining a scoping review and a pilot clinical study, aimed to synthesise global evidence on oral H. pylori detection and investigate the discrepancy between molecular and culture-based findings. MATERIALS AND
methodsA scoping review following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines identified human studies reporting oral H. pylori detection using molecular and/or culture-based methods. Review findings guided a pilot clinical study in which supragingival plaque and oral mucosal swabs were collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic H. pylori-positive individuals. Detection was performed using nested PCR (16 S rRNA and ureA) and selective microaerophilic culture.
resultsThirty-nine studies involving over 3,000 participants were included. Molecular detection rates varied widely (0-90%), while culture-confirmed viable H. pylori was exceedingly rare and restricted to protected anaerobic oral niches. In the pilot study (n = 8), PCR detected H. pylori DNA in 50% of participants, with higher detection in mucosal swabs (37.5%) than supragingival plaque (25%). No viable organisms were recovered by culture, which was dominated by commensal oral species.
conclusionBoth the scoping review and pilot study consistently demonstrated a PCR-positive/culture-negative pattern for oral H. pylori. These findings suggest that oral detection likely reflects transient bacterial presence rather than stable colonisation. Future studies should employ multi-gene molecular assays, targeted sampling, viability-based techniques, and gastric-oral strain comparisons to clarify the biological significance of oral H. pylori detection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although H. pylori DNA is frequently detected in oral samples, viable organisms are rarely identified. Oral PCR positivity should therefore not be interpreted as active infection, and clinical management should continue to rely on established gastric diagnostic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.