ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Epidemiology of spinal fractures in polytrauma patients.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe epidemiology of spinal fractures in polytrauma, population characteristics and their hospital outcomes are not well defined. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and outcomes of spinal fractures in a consensus defined polytrauma cohort.
methodsA 13-year (2009-2021) retrospective study was conducted on Newcastle Definition based polytrauma patients at a Level-1 centre. Polytrauma patients were categorised based on the presence of vertebral fractures and compared in demographics, injury mechanism, injury severity and pattern, physiological parameters, treatment aspects, and outcomes.
resultsFrom the 1425 polytrauma patients, 632 (44.4%) sustained spinal fractures. These patients were older (48 vs. 38 years, p < 0.001) with identical injury severity (ISS = 29), were more frequently admitted (62.8% vs. 57.4%, p = 0.037) and also stayed longer in ICU (6 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) and in hospital (14.5 vs. 12 days, p = 0.002). Mortality did not differ significantly (10.4% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.08). The lumbar spine was the most frequently fractured segment (7.3%), followed by thoracic (3.3%), cervical (3.3%) and sacral (3.1%) levels. Spinal cord injury occurred in 41 (6.5%) spinal fracture patients and was associated with a high ISS and prolonged hospitalisation [ISS:34(IQR 20.5); ICU LOS:10(IQR21.75); Hospital LOS:22(IQR41)]. Spinal fracture patients that classified as polytrauma irrespective of the presence of spinal fracture had a higher ISS (34 vs. 22, p < 0.001), ICU admission rate (75.8% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001), longer hospital LOS (18 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001), higher mortality (12.4% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.001) and lower spinal cord injury rate (4.5% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.001) compared to those who qualified as polytrauma due to the presence of spinal fracture. The subset of spinal fracture patients presenting in traumatic shock had the highest median ISS, hospital resource utilisation and mortality rate.
conclusionSpinal fractures occur in nearly half of the polytrauma patients and 18% of them have multiple vertebral body fractures. These patients are older with similar injury severity and mortality but require more hospital resource utilisation compared to polytrauma patients without spine fractures. The high-risk for mortality spine fracture patients are the ones presenting in shock, with spinal cord injury and those who would meet polytrauma criteria irrespective of the presence of spinal fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.