Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752902›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[A primary care system in Germany: evidence, opportunities, and implementation].

Martin Scherer, Thomas Zimmermann, Eva Hummers

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin SchererInstitut und Poliklinik für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. m.scherer@uke.de.
Thomas ZimmermannInstitut und Poliklinik für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Eva HummersInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International comparisons show that healthcare systems with strong, coordinated primary care often achieve better health outcomes while using resources more efficiently. Against this background, this narrative review, based on the available literature and data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), provides an overview of healthcare structures, utilization, and outcomes in Germany compared with 11 other European countries and interprets the findings in the context of healthcare systems coordinated by primary care.The results show that Germany is characterized by high utilization of healthcare services and high healthcare expenditure, while at the same time performing comparatively poorly on key health indicators, particularly avoidable mortality. Stronger coordination through primary care could help improve these outcomes.At the same time, the findings highlight that the success of primary care-coordinated healthcare systems depends critically on their structural framework. In addition to sufficient primary care capacity, interprofessional teams, robust digital infrastructure, and binding mechanisms for coordination and feedback are essential prerequisites. Strengthening primary care alone, however, is not sufficient: its effectiveness requires far-reaching structural reforms and a stronger orientation of the healthcare system toward preventive measures.

Indexed as

Health Plan ImplementationNational Health ProgramsPrimary Health CareEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansModels, OrganizationalCare coordinationGeneral practitioner-centered careHealthcare system comparisonPerformance indicatorPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID42752902
PMCPMC13623980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.